Fifty Years of the Phyllis Schlafly Report: Liberal “Freedom of Choice” Doesn’t Protect Women From The Draft

With a name like “Equal Rights Amendment,” it’s not too hard to frame the debate to make conservatives look like the bad guys. The rallying cry of feminists was the same as it is today: “Freedom and choice!” They argued that ERA would open new doors for women by giving them more choices in their supposed new-found equality. However, looking below ERA’s surface revealed legislation much more focused on forced compliance than on “choice.” That was the theme of the March 1973 Phyllis Schlafly Report, which explored the question “Should Women Be Drafted?” Of course, this is still a matter of contention to this day, so it is just as important to arm ourselves with the facts to fight the forces of political correctness and social engineering.

Fifty Years of the Phyllis Schlafly Report: What’s Still Wrong with “Equal Rights” For Women

Tornadoes are created by a unique collision between systems of warm and cold air in only the most select of circumstances. Likewise, February 1972 created the ideal conditions for a “perfect storm” that would alter the course of American history forever. Standing in the eye of that storm was a dynamic woman named Phyllis Schlafly. When she wrote the February 1972 issue of the Phyllis Schlafly Report, she did not know that she was going to lead a movement against an overwhelming congressional majority, several acting presidents and their wives, the media, big donors, and a horde of “radical women’s libbers.” However, she still wrote her very first article on the subject as though it would be her last. Each point in the article was a point that she would employ throughout her campaign, and that we can still employ today. Just because the ERA was declared dead by the courts on December 23, 1981 does not mean we do not have to deal with the same ol’ liberal lines today.

Yes, There's a War on Boys

*Previously recorded by Phyllis Schlafly*

Many people don't realize the peculiar ideology of the feminists. They are not promoting equality of male and female; they are for interchangeability of the genders. The feminists are at war with Mother Nature, and Mother Nature keeps winning, so the feminists are constantly angry at what they call criticize as patriarchy.

Taxpayer Funding Supports “Women’s March”

Abortion and trans-gender rhetoric was repeatedly celebrated at the supposed “Women’s March” on Washington in January. Most speakers at this event, which was co-sponsored by Planned Parenthood, used the misleading phrase “reproductive rights,” although one speaker, Kierra Johnson, did say “I am unapologetically abortion positive.”

The Darkness of the Women’s March

President Trump’s inaugural address was well received by the people who voted for him, but the media reacted with predictable hostility as the plain-spoken non-politician repeated the themes he used so successfully during the campaign. Newspapers called the speech dark, a word that was repeated by almost every reporter.

Feminists Decry “Toxic” Masculinity

It’s no secret that men are under attack by feminists on liberal college campuses. Radical feminists have been saying for years that women don’t need men. They say that the two genders are exactly the same in every way, but now they are going even further than that. The feminists at Claremont College in Claremont, California hosted an event to tell men that masculinity is “extremely toxic to our mental health.” The forum featured a number of speakers who recounted the many ways that masculinity had supposedly wronged them. Their ultimate goal was to tell men that acting like men is harmful to themselves and others.